Chapter 8 – Theoretical Biophysics 351
Szilard model, which allows reversible transitions to occur between droplets of different size
as they exchange material through diffusion, both through droplets growing (or “ripening”)
and shrinking.
For a simple theoretical treatment of this effect, if N is the number of biomolecules phase
separated into a droplet, then the free energy ΔG in the super-saturated regime can be mod
eled as –AN + BN2/3 where A and B are positive constants that depend upon the enthalpic of
interaction and energy per unit area at the interface between the droplet and the surrounding
water solvent due to surface tension (see Worked Case Example 8.3). This results in a max
imum value ΔGmax as a function of N, which thus serves as a nucleation activation barrier;
from ΔG in the range 0–ΔGmax, the effect from surface tension slows down the rate of droplet
growth, whereas above ΔGmax, droplet growth is less impaired by surface tension and more
dominated by the net gain in enthalpy, at the expense of depleting the population of smaller
droplets (this process is known as Ostwald ripening (also known as coarsening) and is a sig
nature of liquid–liquid phase transitions).
Sviliard modeling can explain the qualitative appearance of size distributions of droplets,
but it does not explain what drives the fine-tuning of the A and B parameters, which is down
to molecular scale interaction forces. A valuable modeling approach which has emerged to
address these questions has involved a stickers-and-spacers framework that has been adapted
from the field of interacting polymers (Choi et al., 2020). This approach models interacting
polymers as strings which contain several sticker regions separated by noninteracting spacer
sequences, such that the spacers can undergo spatial fluctuations to enable interactions
between stickers either from the same molecule or with neighbors. Stickers are defined
at specific locations of the molecule due to the likelihood of electrostatic or hydrophobic
interactions (which are dependent on the nature of the sequence of the associated polymer,
typically either RNA or a peptide) to enable insight into how multivalent proteins and RNA
molecules can drive phase transitions that give rise to biomolecular condensates. The reduc
tion in complexity in modeling a polymer as a string with sticky regions avails the approach
to coarse-graining computation and so has been very successful in simulating how droplets
form over relatively extended durations of several microseconds even for systems containing
many thousands of molecules.
8.4 REACTION, DIFFUSION, AND FLOW
Reaction–diffusion continuum mathematical models can be applied to characterize systems
that involve a combination of chemical reaction kinetics and mobility through diffusional
processes. This covers a wide range of phenomena in the life sciences. These mathematical
descriptions can sometimes be made more tractable by first solving in the limits of being
either diffusion limited (i.e., fast reaction kinetics, slow diffusion) or reaction limited (fast
diffusion, slow reaction kinetics), though several processes occur in an intermediate regime in
which both reaction and diffusion effects need to be considered. For example, the movement
of molecular motors on tracks in general comprises both a random 1D diffusional element
and a chemical reaction element that results in bias of the direction of the motor motion on
the track. Other important continuum approaches include methods that characterize fluid
flow in and around the biological structures.
8.4.1 MARKOV MODELS
The simplest general reaction–diffusion equation that considers the spatial distribution of
the localization probability P of a biomolecule as a function of time t at a given point in space
is as follows:
(8.64)
∂
∂=
∇
+ ( )
P
t
D
P
v P
2